Mika Vs. Joe on Iraq
WMD’s ~ Myth or Reality?
Mr. Sada’s comments come just more than a month after
Below is an updated edition of some of the proofs I used from a debate with a professor of history from
Just some of the "stuff" our boys "didn't" find in
From: "Disinformation: 22 Media Myths that Undermine the War on Terror":
From a Daily News Article:
Also, 750 shells with saran gas were found. Just 15 of these killed about 15,000 people, pictured below.
Protest Warrior sign:
These vials pictured below were found in a safe house with other items mentioned in the Daily News article (scientists, lab equipment, and the like).
97-Vials with Agents of Mass Destruction:
The below picture is some lab equipment found in a Mosque along with research scientists.
As our troops moved in, many documents were burned and destroyed. While we still have many hundreds of thousands of paperwork found still needing to be translated… much was lost.
What was discovered was dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that
This caused the
If Bush lied about WMDs, then what did Clinton do when he said:
Or how about Madeline Albright, John F. Kerry, Ted Kennedy, and the like?
If Bush lied, then all these persons did as well. You really can't have it both ways. You can't say President Bush lied while Senator Kerry and others, who said the same thing, were being honest.
There is no one who has made a remotely persuasive case that Bush lied. The German, Russian, French, Israeli, British, Chinese, Jordanian, and U.S. governments (as well as others) all agreed that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Saddam said he did! The German evaluation was even more severe than America's estimates. They were convinced Saddam would have a nuclear weapon by 2005.
Apparently, bush, while being called a dunce or ignoramus by the left is so intelligently diabolical that he got every intelligence agency - not to mention every Democrat - to lie for him as well. So is Bush still the "dunce of the class," as the Left paints him; or is he so intelligent that he fooled the world, as the Left paints him. Which is it? Or are both views partisan?
If Bush lied, then he must have known there were no weapons in Iraq. There is no such thing as a lie unless you know the truth. If you say you believe something to be true, and it ultimately becomes false, that's not called a "lie," that's called a "mistake" – a mistake made by the CIA (and the world) that was beyond the Bush's control.