(insert "Democrats" in where it says "Obama")

Osama vs Obama

Osama rhetoric matches – almost word for word not to mention thought for thought – the rhetoric I here coming from the Left almost daily in this country. I will bring out a point or two from his speech and comment on it, but if you want… you can read the entire thing at MSNBC who has the entire transcript of Osama’s DNC speech.

I will post just a few political stances that are in tune with the Democratic Party as expressed by Schuemer, Obama, Pelosi, Kennedy, and others. Let’s delve in on that note.

I want to first zero in on two authors Osama mentioned in his crazy rants (click on them to enlarge):

Every one should know by now Chomsky’s position on politics… he is a Marxist and hates capitalism, America, etc, etc. If asked what he loves about America he would probably respond, “The mountains and streams.” But few know about Michael Scheuer, the author of some books slamming President Bush’s policy on terrorism. He published first as “Anonymous,” but then it became apparent who the author was. He was an insider at the CIA, but being an insider at the CIA doesn’t disqualify your biases, as we shall see in some commentary here:

Not long ago, a nameless CIA operative published Imperial Hubris, a scathing analysis of the Bush administration’s war on terror. Eventually, word spread that the author, called “Anonymous” on the book jacket, was one Michael Scheuer.

In the meantime, both the Washington press corps and the CIA had played a sort of coy game of gossiping in private about the real identification of the author while publicly maintaining the mystique of an anonymous authoritative insider whose station was too high up and too covert to be disclosed.

But once Scheuer was publicly identified, the world could examine what he had to say on various topics. People weren’t impressed — especially by Scheuer’s assertions in interviews that Osama bin Laden shouldn’t be identified as a terrorist, and that the Holocaust Museum in Washington was a means to make Americans feel guilty about the Holocaust….

….Scheuer sounds goofier each time he gives an interview — and the credibility of his once anonymously written Imperial Hubris shakier and shakier. Isikoff has never quite recovered his journalistic reputation. We all know what happened to Dan Rather.

Victor Davis Hanson

“No More Anonymous, Please”

He [Michael Scheuer] has also been caught up in controversy, asserting for example that Israel has been conducting clandestine operations to influence American politics. Pressed to provide an example, he has cited, bizarrely, the establishment of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum on the National Mall. So high-profile has Scheuer become that even Osama bin Laden has been taking note. In his newly released video, the leader of al Qaeda singles Scheuer out as one of two writers--the other is Noam Chomsky--worth reading about world and Islamic affairs.

Gabriel Schoenfeld

“The CIA Examines Itself”

He doesn’t want Osama Ben Laden titled a terrorist? He also seems to show some conspiratorial views of the Jewish influence in America and abroad, as well as an almost blatant anti-Semitism. So who’s hubris is imperial? It would make complete sense for a person like Osama Ben Laden to quote from or reference these two authors. If these two authors were in charge of the country, Osama would still be living large in Afghanistan, and possibly setting eyes on the Middle-East.

Chomsky and Osama both view President Bush, Cheney, and the like (as well as many Democrats) as the real terrorists.

Not only this, but in my discussions with many Democrats, liberals, and green-party affiliates, they all seem to conclude – like Chomsky and Obama – that corporations are in control of most things in our existence. Corporations were behind the Vietnam War:

Behind the Kennedy assassination:

Behind the Iraq war:

Basically, Osama blames everything on this mix of corporate wizards and the neo-cons who support them. In fact, this next little run of “ills’ in the United States sounds just like a campaign ad for the Democratic Party:

Not only does Osama’s political views fit well within the mainstream Democratic Party line, they also fit in well with their stance on Global Warming and the Bush “reign” not signing the Kyoto treaty.

Osama also calls for the overthrow of the capitalist system when he states the following:

We can see a connection here with this type of revolutionary thinking and the Democratic Party by who they support, view as moral hero’s and all-in-all rub shoulders with:

Glover is a big supporter of Venezuela’s president Hugo Chavez, and is currently in the crosshairs of filmmakers in the South American country who oppose the actor’s decision to accept $18 million in government funds to shoot a movie about Haitian revolutionary Toussaint L’Ouverture. He also went on the campaign trail with John Edwards. Cindy Sheehan supports Democrats but think they do not go far enough to stop the currant war. And Sean Penn is also a proud Democrat:

"...And Leo was never a card-carrying communist; he was a Democrat all his life...he went to some meetings (Communist Party USA) and was interested in what they had to say..."

- Eileen Ryan Penn, mother of Sean Penn, on her husband and Sean's father, blacklisted Communist...meeting attender...Leo Penn

This seems to be the new battle cry, “We are not Communists! We are Democrats!” Corporations, neo-cons, global warming, millions without health-care, on and on. It’s the same old propaganda in the same old clothes.

This whole war on terror will never be fought correctly or with as much understanding from people who believe the following, “the death penalty is inhumane... whether that person is in a jail or it's bin Laden.” I have to wrap this blog up and go to work, but more will follow.