"people who look exactly like you" ~ Keith Olbermann

Broliath h/t

Black Tea Partiers Set the Record Straight

ViralVideo h/t

Bob Parks (from Black & Right) Was On Al Sharpton's Radio Show Talking About Tea Parties

 (NewsBusters h/t)

Bob Parks was on Al Sharpton's radio program yesterday. Bob was on opposite another guest, Professor Eddie Glaude of Princeton University. The topic was Tea Party "racism." Al Sharpton shows his educational level, and the professor shows his ignorant bias.

Zo on Tea Parties and Race Cards

Some Background: Zo was the only speaker at the Dallas tea party specifically named in the now infamous “minstrel show” hit piece. 

Busted... Tried To Tell Police Tea Partiers Committed Crime... OOOPS! Video Evidence Says Otherwise

VIDEO – The Egg Man Of Seachlight, Nevada

Tea Partier Schools Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Florida) -- Rick Sanchez Backs Off After Realizing His Rhetoric Won't Work Here (He Even Bites His Lip)

Jordan Marks holds his own and makes a sitting Congressman look silly. "Apologize to my 5-year old son" -- What?! Rep. Alan Grayson puts a death sentence on his kid? Weird. You can see this Democrats elitist mentality as he scold a U.S. Citizen/voter as if he is a child..."You need to apologize!" (NewsBusters h/t)

 

  Tea Partier Schools CNN’s Rick Sanchez and Rep. Alan Grayson

- Watch more Politics Videos at Vodpod.

BoooYa! Bill O'Reilly Deconstructs the Rev. Al Sharpton's Assertion

 NewsBusters h/t

See previous post:

• Rush & Beck on Dem Hypocrisy and Supposed Threats to Them vs. Threats to Republicans 

 

"Black & Right" Displays the Hypocrisy of the Left and Painting the Right Violent

Black & Right h/t

Rev. Wayne Perryman Speaks With Michael Medved About Historic Democratic Racism

The Rev. Wayne Perryman Speaks With Michael Medved About Historic Democratic Racism from Papa Giorgio on Vimeo.

"Because he's a black man" Is Why Israeli's Don't Like Him!? -- Dumb Lib-Tards

Are Israeli Jews much more bigoted than their American co-religionists? An astounding 77% of American Jews voted for Barack Obama.  But according to Ethan Bronner [with a little "help" from Chris Matthews], anti-black "racism" and anti-Arab "prejudice" are significant factors accounting for PBO's unpopularity in Israel.

Rev Wright Gives Himself "Lifetime Achievement" Award -- Weird! (Bill O'Reilly)

God Blessed Racism Video and Quotes (wanted it all in one place for my use)

"How many books of Cones have you read!?"

This is the $ quote from the interview above with Obama's past pastor . So I did. Could you imagine if McCain or Bush went to a church for twenty years headed by a pastor whom -- a) brought you to your faith, b) married you and your wife, c) baptized your kids, and was d) on your campaign staff -- sold hitler's Mein Kampf in the church's bookstore. Not only that but on national television recommended this same book? We would never hear the end of it. Never. In fact, this fictitious person would never make it on a ballot.

"The personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew" ~ Adolf Hitler - Mein Kampf

•     The goal of black theology is the destruction of everything white, so that blacks can be liberated from alien gods. (Book from Obamas Churchs bookstore) A Black Theology of Liberation, James Cone, p.62
•     White religionists are not capable of perceiving the blackness of God, because their satanic whiteness is a denial of the very essence of divinity. That is why whites are finding and will continue to find the black experience a disturbing reality. (Book from Obamas Churchs bookstore) A Black Theology of Liberation, James Cone, p.64

=============================

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

"I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord" ~ Adolf Hitler - Mein Kampf

•     There is no place in black theology for a colorless God in a society where human beings suffer precisely because of their color. The black theologian must reject any conception of God which stifles black self-determination by picturing God as a God of all peoples. (Book from Obamas Churchs bookstore) A Black Theology of Liberation, James Cone, p.63
•     Christianity is not alien to Black Power, Christianity is Black Power. (Book from Obamas Churchs bookstore) Black Theology & Black Power, James Cone, p.38
•     In contrast to this racist view of God, black theology proclaims God's blackness. Those who want to know who God is and what God is doing must know who black persons are and what they are doing. (Book from Obamas Churchs bookstore) A Black Theology of Liberation, James Cone, p.65

=============================

"The [Nazi party] should not become a constable of public opinion, but must dominate it. It must not become a servant of the masses, but their master!" ~ Adolf Hitler - Mein Kampf

•     These new theologians of the Third World argue that Christians [liberation theology accepting Christians] should not shun violence but should initiate it... (Book from Obamas Churchs bookstore) Black Theology & Black Power, James Cone, p.32
•     It is important to make a further distinction here among black hatred, black racism, and Black Power. Black hatred is the black man's strong aversion to white society. No black man living in white America can escape it. (Book from Obamas Churchs bookstore) Black Theology & Black Power, James Cone, p.14
•     It is this fact that makes all white churches anti-Christian in their essence. To be Christian is to be one of those whom God has chosen. God has chosen black people! (Book from Obamas Churchs bookstore) Black Theology & Black Power, James Cone, p.151
•     It [black liberation theology] is dangerous because the true prophet of the gospel of God must become both "anti-Christian" and "unpatriotic.".... Because whiteness by its very nature is against blackness, the black prophet is a prophet of national doom. He proclaims the end of the American Way,... (Book from Obamas Churchs bookstore) A Black Theology of Liberation, James Cone, p.55-56

=============================

(Below are quotes from James H. Cone, A Black Theology of  Liberation ~ a book sold in Obama's church's bookstore the entire  20-years he attended.)

~~~~~~~~~~~

"It is dangerous because the true prophet of the gospel of God  must become both 'anti-Christian' and 'unpatriotic.' (55) …. Because  whiteness by its very nature is against blackness, the black prophet is a  prophet of national doom. He proclaims the end of the 'American  Way...'" (56

~~~~~~~~~~~

"But this does not mean that religion is irrelevant altogether;  it only means that religion unrelated to black liberation is  irrelevant."  (58-59)

~~~~~~~~~~~

"... it is that whites are incapable of making any valid judgment  about human existence. The goal of black theology is the destruc¬tion  of everything white, so that blacks can be liberated from alien gods.   The God of black liberation will not be confused with a blood' thirsty  white idol. Black theology must show that the black God has nothing to  do with the God worshiped in white churches whose primary purpose is to  sanctify the racism of whites and to daub the wounds of blacks. Putting  new wine in new wineskins means that the black theology view of God has  nothing in common with those who prayed for an American victory in  Vietnam or who pray for a "cool" summer in the ghetto....  There is no  place in black theology for a colorless God in a society where human  beings suffer precisely because of their color. The black theologian  must reject any conception of God which stifles black self-determination  by picturing God as a God of all peoples. Either God is identified with  the oppressed to the point that their experience becomes God's  experience, or God is a God of racism....  Because God has made the goal  of blacks God's own goal, black theology believes that it is not only  appropriate but necessary to begin the doctrine of God with an  insistence on God's blackness."  (62-63)

~~~~~~~~~~~

"White religionists are not capable of perceiving the blackness  of God, because their satanic whiteness is a denial of the very essence  of divinity. That is why whites are finding and will continue to find  the black experience a disturbing reality."  (64)

~~~~~~~~~~~

"In contrast to this racist view of God, black theology proclaims  God's blackness. Those who want to know who God is and what God is  doing must know who black persons are and what they are doing. " (65)

~~~~~~~~~~~

"God comes to us in God's blackness, which is wholly unlike  white¬ness. To receive God's revelation is to become black with God by  joining God in the work of liberation.... Becoming one of God's  disciples means rejecting whiteness and accepting themselves as they are  in all their physical blackness."  (66)

~~~~~~~~~~~

"Black theology cannot accept a view of God which does not  represent God as being for oppressed blacks and thus against white  oppressors. Living in a world of white oppressors, blacks have no time  for a neutral God. The brutalities are too great and the pain too  severe, and this means we must know where God is and what God is doing  in the revolution.... What we need is the divine love as expressed in  black power, which is the power of blacks to destroy their oppressors,  here and now, by any means at their disposal. Unless God is  participating in this holy activity, we must reject God's love."  (70)

~~~~~~~~~~~

"God is black because God loves us; and God loves us because we  are black.  Righteousness is that side of God which expresses itself  through black liberation.  God makes black what humans have made  white.... Love is a refusal to accept whiteness."  (73-74)

~~~~~~~~~~~

"If creation 'involves a bringing into existence of something  that did not exist before,' then to say God is creator means that my  being finds its source in God. I am black because God is black!  God as  creator is the ground of my blackness (being), the point of reference  for meaning and purpose in the universe.... Rather it is incumbent upon  me by the freedom granted by the creator to deny whiteness and affirm  blackness as the essence of God.  That is why it is necessary to speak  of the black revolution rather than reformation. The idea of reformation  suggests that there is still something 'good' in the system itself,  which needs only to be cleaned up a bit.  This is a false perception of  reality. The system is based on whiteness, and what is necessary is a  replacement of whiteness with blackness." (75-76)

~~~~~~~~~~~

"Being white excludes them from the black community and thus  whatever concern they have for blacks will invariably work against black  freedom....  Certainly if whites expect to be able to say anything  relevant to the self-determination of the black community, it will be  necessary for them to destroy their whiteness by becoming members of an  oppressed community. Whites will be free only when they become new  persons—when their white being has passed away and they are created anew  in black being. When this happens, they are no longer white but free,  and thus capable of making decisions about the destiny of the black  community."  (97)

~~~~~~~~~~~

• Born Again: "They [white people] would destroy  themselves and be born again as beautiful black persons."  (103);
• Sin:  "This means that whites, despite their self-proclaimed religiousness,  are rendered incapable of making valid judgments on the character of  sin.... In a word, sin is whiteness..."  (106, 108);
• Salvation:  "Salvation, then, primarily has to do with earthly reality and the  injustice inflicted on those who are helpless and poor. To see the  salvation of God is to see this people rise up against its oppressors,  demanding that justice become a reality now, not tomorrow."  (128)

~~~~~~~~~~~ (Above are quotes from James H. Cone, A Black Theology of  Liberation ~ a book sold in Obama's church's bookstore the entire  20-years he attended.)

Obamacon - Twenty Years In A Racist Church from Papa Giorgio on Vimeo.

Andrew Breitbart, Hannah Giles, and Max Blumenthal = A Journalism "Scoop"

A Breitbart Import

Max Blumenthal, You’re Being Booger-Boarded

Max Blumenthal has an amazing thesis:  All conservatives and Republicans are beneath contempt.  He also has an amazing line of work.  He is underwritten by various media organs to prove his thesis.

In a previous era, Blumenthal and said media organs (Salon, Independent Film Channel, Huffington Post, etc.) were able to get away with this pathetic arrangement.   But now, we are on to Max, the spawn of Sid “Vicious” Blumenthal – he who attempted to ruin Monica Lewinsky’s life by falsely portraying her as Bill Clinton’s “stalker.”

The Blumenthal operation is now under the extremely close scrutiny of a camelid named “Retracto.”

The movement formerly known as the “Tea-Baggers” (with their flip cameras and new media skills) and various conservatives who have had enough with the excessive Alinsky tactics used most egregiously by Max and Sid but representative of main stream media’s odious guilt-by-association, repeat-the-same-lie-until-it-sticks, smear-any-conservative-as-racist-sexist-homophobic skill set, are now fighting back.

If the last two weeks have not humiliated him enough — and this Huffington Post rage-fest from yesterday with its title “Feeling the Hate at CPAC 2010 With Andrew Breitbart, Hannah Giles and the Crazy Mob” suggests they have not – then perhaps this coup de booger will tell him that we say what we mean and we mean what we say.

Max gallivanted around CPAC looking for prey.  He was treated with respect as he sought to make good and decent people look foolish on camera.  He decided he would go after a 20-year-old girl, one Hannah Giles.  And perhaps due to sexism or ageism he underestimated her ability.  Max should have called Bertha Lewis before he went after this young heroine.  Instead, he went to a gunfight with a knife – and a dirty nose.

Ladies and gentlemen, the much awaited, “Max Blumenthal Picks a Booger Out of His Nose at CPAC” video:

...(read more)...

Walter Williams & Thomas Sowell Tackle Minimum Wage

WOW! "Breitbart goes nuclear on Salon writer at CPAC for smearing James O’Keefe as racist"

 (Full Story at HotAir)

 Breitbart has balls!

Janeane Garofalo & Keith Olbermann Look Silly

 

From author of the above video:

So last night that race-peddlin' buffoon over at MSNBC... wait, that's pretty much everyone on that network. Let me be more specific. OK, so, last night Keith Olbermann used his self-parodying Special Comment segment to ask the following question: Where are the people of color at the Tea Parties? Now, implying and outright saying that Tea Party protesters are racist is commonplace in the far left. No news there. But two things in particular bother me about his question:

First, his choice of words. People of color? Who are these colored people he's referring to? What does that mean? It may be because I'm not a native English speaker, but I find this people of color business to be really bizarre. So as a Boricua, am I colored? I guess I'm olive but if I hit the beach on a sunny day I can be golden brown. Is he referring strictly to skin color? Culture? Ethnicity? I mean, I'm not that much darker than Mr. Olbermann himself. Do I fall into his people of color category?

Or, as I suspect, are people of color just code for those who deviate too much from the skin color which Olbermann seems to deem as the standard? I mean, come on, Olbermann has no color, right? He's white. That ain't no color. That's just how it's supposed to be, right? So, all I can think of is that he means black. Black people are colored, and everyone else is just normal and a-OK. Man, this race and colors stuff is difficult to understand!

And secondly, the question is stupid, the premise terribly moronic and the insinuation totally insulting. The Tea Party protesters aren't racist. Are there a few kooks with nefarious motivations? Sure, every movement has them. It's nice how, during the Bush years, the MSM did everything they could to whitewash the fringe elements of the antiwar movement, but I digress. Whats Olbermann's evidence that Tea Parties are overwhelmingly racist? Apparently, that there are no people of color at these rallies. That is so blatantly false as to induce uncontrollable laughter. There are people of all backgrounds at the Tea Parties. But even if an event is dominated by a certain race group, what does that prove? Similar to what Glenn Reynolds said earlier this month, if you look at a group of white folks and the first thought that pops into your head is "racists!" then you have some serious issues.

So I put together this video response to Olbermann's burning question. Here are his "people of color" he's been inquiring about.

What Is The #1 Killer of Black People? (AIDs? Heart Disease? Violence?)

"But Is It Life?" -- Planned Parenthood, Sean James, and Al Joyner Get It Wrong (Maafa21 Video Trailer at the Bottom)

"We do not want word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro population."

~ Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood ~

Conversations from the Pit

One of the best articles by Prager. It is amazing how this is working its way out almost daily in our little confined work area we all the “pit.” We have a glowing example of many years of work by the left-leaning establishment that is often called “higher education,” which has turned out a zombie of non-thought who would rather use the seven words below in Dennis Prager’s article, or extreme cases (mentally ill or deformed babied in utero for showing why abortion is good, or a bad foster care story -- when there are more stories in the positive typically than the negative) to make a point.

Even at my friends site you will often here a horror story about a child not having health-care and then the label, “Bush doesn’t care about the children.” These are non-statements. There is no critical thinking involved.

When talking about abortion, for instance in our “pit,” I hear some story and then I merely respond, “that’s fine, but that doesn’t deal with whether the ‘fetus’ is a life or not.” Then I hear some grand tail about a women’s choice, and I respond, “that’s great, but that doesn’t deal with the issue of whether the ‘fetus’ is a life or not.” That is the question. Then the “you’ll never know what it is like” line comes out, referring to me being a man, ergo, I cannot have as valid an input on the matter, to which I responded/respond with examples of people who do have the personal capability to respond. Like Norma McCorvey, who was “Jane Roe” in Roe v. Wade (1973), she wrote a book that is pictured here (as well as a DVD).

I brought up Gianna Jessen, who was herself a survivor of an abortion, her story (and book, as well as) are very compelling, and often, when young university minds are being steeped in feminist philosophies, rarely is there ever time taken to study or reflect on the other side of the issue, as I was told after I asked a this question, “so at 24-years old you have looked at both sides of the issue and all the evidence and arguments and have concluded that you are right and there is no evidence left to compel you,” the response was “yep!”

A great 40-minute video can be found here. This presentation is rational, well thought out, and rarely responded to by the Left.

Another personage that I typically bring up is Bernard Nathanson, who

as a younger man, he had been strongly pro-choice, and he performed an abortion on a woman who had become pregnant by him. He later gained national attention by then becoming one of the founding members of the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws, now known as NARAL Pro-Choice America. He worked with Betty Friedan and others for the legalization of abortion in the United States. Their efforts essentially succeeded with the Roe v Wade decision. He was also for a time the director of the Center for Reproductive and Sexual Health (CRASH), New York's largest abortion clinic. Nathanson has written that he was responsible for over 75,000 abortions throughout his pro-choice career.

He likewise wrote a book. Is he someone who would have some valuable input on the matter? Of course, his sex has nothing to do with it… unless you’re sexist. Dr. Nathanson is best known for his “Silent Scream” video (it is very dated), where a baby is shown being aborted via ultrasound images. What the video details is as the abortion procedure gets under way, the baby starts to literally scream, except there is no air to carry the cries of agony and pain. The entire video is linked above, but I will show the poignant part here. CAUTION, this is GRAPHIC, as it is ending a perfectly viable life... unless you are pro-choice, then this is just like any other operation -- like removing your appendix, or tonsils:

I doubt the person in conversation with me has done much in the way of reading and contemplating this issue much beyond what she deems to be liberating feminist theory rebuffing the patriarchy. People who are protecting their emotional belief very rarely go out and pick up a book like Defending Life: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice, by Francis Beckwith. Which is too bad.

I mentioned Kathy Ireland and her appearance on Bill Maher’s show, Politically Incorrect, where she responded to a question (from a debate a few years back):

I am thrilled Cheryl to hear you want to do away with 97-percent of abortions. But unfortunately, a vast majority of secularized America – mainly the left – would be thrown into fits over such a question. It gets to the root of their view self-destructing.

Kathy Ireland, many years ago, was on Bill Mahers Politically Incorrect and the discussion that ensued shows the frailty of the liberal/relativistic position:

Bill Maher: Kathy, why do you oppose a women’s right to choose

Kathy Ireland: Bill, when my husband was going to medical school I underwent a transformation. Because I used to be in favor of abortion. But I noticed when I was reading through some of his medical teaching books, that according to a law in science known as the law of biogenesis, every living thing reproduces after it own kind. That means dog produce dogs, cats produce cats, humans produce humans. If we want to know what something is we simply ask what are its parents. If we know what the parents are, we know what the thing in question is. And I reasoned from that because human parents can only produce human offspring, unborn human fetuses could be nothing but human beings, because the law of biogenesis rules out every other alternative. And I concluded therefore that because human fetuses were part of our family, we should not harm them without justification.

Bill Maher: Well Kathy, that’s just your opinion!

In October 2002, Kathy Ireland made a compelling argument against abortion on the Fox News Channel's Hannity and Colmes political debate show. Alan Colmes described Ireland's opinions as religious, but Ireland said that her views on abortion do not stem from faith. She asserted that even atheists could realize that abortion is wrong. Kathy told Alan that her belief is founded in science and technology, which she says, "has come a long way since Roe vs. Wade."

Ireland also defended her values as being pro-women, stating, "We need to support these women who are in crisis pregnancy situations." She claimed that because scientific evidence proves that abortion is murder, "I have no choice but to defend the most vulnerable among us."

Cheryl, you may enjoy one of my favorite speakers on the subject. He gave this 40-minute speech at Gordon College; it may enlighten and embolden your view.

John Stewart Lambasts Chris Matthews on Obama Being Black

Massachusens are Racist -- If You Own a Pickup... You're Racist